The New Jersey Division of Investment manages one of the largest US public pension funds, overseeing billions in retirement savings on behalf of public employees. With total assets of over $90 billion, the pension fund provides retirement benefits to over 800,000 current and retired state and local government workers. Proper oversight of the pension fund investments is crucial to ensure sufficient funding for future pension obligations. This article will analyze the pension fund’s investment strategy, performance, and key governance issues.

Diversified asset allocation targets 7.5% return
The New Jersey pension fund pursues a diversified asset allocation strategy across stocks, bonds, real assets, private equity, and hedge funds. The targeted portfolio asset mix aims to generate a long-term annualized return of 7.5%. However, the actual annual returns have fallen short of this goal over the past decade. The pension fund’s assumptions and strategic asset allocation deserve close scrutiny to determine if adjustments are warranted.
Ranked among top US pension funds by size
As one of the largest US public pension funds, the New Jersey pension fund ranked 7th by total assets in 2021, according to Pensions & Investments data. The fund’s large size confers key advantages in terms of investment scale and bargaining power. However, it also faces governance challenges regarding oversight and vulnerability to political pressures on investment decisions.
Funding ratio below national median
While the pension fund remains substantial in absolute dollar terms, its funding ratio measuring assets to liabilities sits below the national median for state retirement systems. Strengthening the funding ratio is crucial for the state to meet long-term pension obligations without over-burdening taxpayers. More conservative return assumptions and accelerated contribution schedules have been proposed by some critics.
Debate over hedge fund investments and fees
The New Jersey pension fund has allocated billions to higher-cost alternative investments like hedge funds, drawing criticism from some policymakers and taxpayer groups. Supporters argue hedge funds provide diversification and skill-based returns that justify the fees. However, hedge fund returns have been lackluster in recent years. There is an ongoing debate regarding the appropriate level of alternatives in the portfolio.
The New Jersey public pension fund plays a vital role in providing retirement security for hundreds of thousands of the state’s public servants. With over $90 billion in assets under management, the fund relies on achieving its projected 7.5% return target to meet future liabilities. However, funding gaps and debates over investment strategy reveal the challenges in effectively overseeing such a large pool of public employee retirement savings.